RBIngraham wrote:Darn... that wasn't it! still showing up as an attachment...
jlepore wrote:ok guys ... really, I'm trying to get some work done today, and I can't really do that with soda flying out of my nose every time I read a new posting in that chain!
Rider Friendly - a comment from the guy that had to ask about gain structure ... when is the last time anyone accidentally gave him a rider?
I work on both sides of the fence - as the FOH for a major act, and as a "house" guy for local production companies. Never in my wildest dreams would I ever accept a SAC rig for my gigs, and I would personally never offer one. I may bring mine out on a low budget gig or those "favor" gigs, but never for anything serious anymore. It has disappointed me WAY too many times. I am even renting a Pro-1 for an upcoming "16 input party" gig instead of taking my sac rig out. It's just easier, faster and more reliable.
shmick wrote:Wow. Just wow. mr_es335 is taking being a sycophant to a whole new level.
Ya gotta wonder what the die-hard SAW folks are thinking. To me, it seems like yet another milestone of Bob's work being left in the dust of everyone else being innovative.
My favourite part is when others gang up on the newer products, claiming that they stole the idea from Bob.
The SAC Forum:
RBIngraham wrote:Well it's gone now, so you can get some work done.
RBIngraham wrote:Well it's gone now, so you can get some work done.
A rider is a person on horseback right?
shmick wrote:Wow. Just wow. mr_es335 is taking being a sycophant to a whole new level.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests