RBIngraham wrote:Clearly you're not thinking of the same "level" of "church" that Brent is probably working at.
I thought the iLive would allow for multiple surfaces to talk to the same frame or network of frames as well. Or are we talking about something more slick than that when you say you can have 2 operators? I thought Digico could do that as well.
Of course I would point out that if you want to be technical about it, even an M7 can allow for that. I've had a board op at the console while I work on Studio Manager at the tech table for years now. Same idea really (again, unless I'm missing something). It's just that now days you can have actual surfaces at each workstation.
And of course you can do that same thing with AMP and/or SAC as well. You just get into the whole debate about what is an adequate control surfaces. While I would never mix a show (unless it was a very simple project) with just a mouse. I've always been faster at dialing in EQ, Dynamics and other stuff using Studio Manager and a mouse on the M7 than at the console itself. Even more so on the LS9. Some things worked better at the console and others are easier inside studio manager.
RBIngraham wrote:...
I just assumed if he was looking at Soundcraft Vi, budget is probably not the number one system design concern. The Qu is not even close to being in the same class of console really. By Venice do you mean an analog Midas? I don't know of too many folks specifying analog consoles at all
...
lowdbrent wrote:There is no separation between the two. The build quality of the current gen is different than the first. The first was not that great. It is a price point product. If you think you are going to buy a thick, dense, robust console for that kind of money, you be dreamin'.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests